Re: Class?

Comments are busted at Ms. Aniston’s blog (it com­plains about a miss­ing captcha, except there’s nowhere on the page to enter it), so I’ll throw my answer to her ques­tion here:

One pos­si­ble method of determing class is to use sta­tion in the hier­ar­chy as a met­ric. If you have a boss, and you have peo­ple who call you boss, you’re mid­dle. If you only have those who call you boss, you’re upper. If you only call oth­ers boss, you’re proletarian.

Of course, that gets murky when you’ve got “team leader,” and journeyperson/apprentice sit­u­a­tions, which comes back to the IWW’s met­ric: can you fire oth­ers? If so, you are a boss. Perhaps not the boss, but cer­tainly a boss. If you can­not fire oth­ers, you are not. I should prob­a­bly note that I’m not in favor of sim­ply grant­ing small busi­ness own­ers a pass. Ultimately all small busi­ness own­ers are sim­ply large busi­ness own­ers in an infan­tile state — those who do not aspire to be bil­lion­aires are on the way to sell­ing their busi­ness to those who do. I liked Trotsky’s take on their role (and dan­ger) in Fascism: What it is and how to fight it.

One Response

  1. There’s a sub­set of small busi­ness own­ers. People who can’t or won’t make them­selves employ­able in the con­ven­tional struc­tures. They tend not to be able to offer employ­ment either, at least not reg­u­larly. Most of them live in rural or the less afflu­ent urban areas. They’re inel­i­gi­ble for union mem­ber­ship, by virtue of occa­sional hir­ing and/or the legal sta­tus of the busi­ness. The Ma and Pa stores are good exam­ple. The guy who owns a lawn­mower, a weed­whacker, a chain­saw and a pickup truck is another. They’re not look­ing to get rich. They just can’t bring them­selves to call some­one “boss” every day. It’s the American Dream (now with pro­tected bank­ruptcy, the most com­mon fate, almost com­pletely out of reach and karoshi claim­ing many of the rest).

    We’re going to have a whole class of effec­tively crim­i­nal­ized petit bour­geois soon. They, along with the down­wardly mobile, for­merly employ­able mid­dle class, form the recruit­ing base for a pop­ulist author­i­tar­ian move­ment, and some­times state spon­sored domes­tic ter­ror­ist groups. Just like Trotsky says.

Leave a Reply

*