Comments on: Fool Me Once http://ignore.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/ Living Without Privacy Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:31:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: James Cape http://ignore.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/comment-page-1/#comment-42320 James Cape Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:21:27 +0000 http://ignore-your.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/#comment-42320 <em>forget bind, just use dnsmasq instead.</em> The nameserver is authoritative for 4 domains and (currently) 12 VLANs, clients on any one of which could be using DDNS. There are slave nameservers on the other side of the (currently sole, soon to be many) WAN link(s), and we need as close to 5-nines as is practical. I appreciate the pointer, but dnsmasq is not even close to being an option for that situation. :-) forget bind, just use dnsmasq instead.

The nameserver is authoritative for 4 domains and (currently) 12 VLANs, clients on any one of which could be using DDNS. There are slave nameservers on the other side of the (currently sole, soon to be many) WAN link(s), and we need as close to 5-nines as is practical.

I appreciate the pointer, but dnsmasq is not even close to being an option for that situation. :-)

]]> By: Xav http://ignore.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/comment-page-1/#comment-42222 Xav Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:46:13 +0000 http://ignore-your.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/#comment-42222 Hi, forget bind, just use dnsmasq instead. Hi,

forget bind, just use dnsmasq instead.

]]> By: An American http://ignore.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/comment-page-1/#comment-41940 An American Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:49:47 +0000 http://ignore-your.tv/2007/04/08/fool-me-once/#comment-41940 We win! Hah! We win! Hah!

]]>