Little Differences: London

[Jules and Vincent]This is me, try­ing to record a few off­hand obser­va­tions, and ridicu­lously try to link them to larger social trends and stereo­types, aside from the stuff every­body already knows, e.g. the habit of dri­ving on the wrong side of the road.

Climate Change

Air con­di­tion­ing sim­ply isn’t used as much here in London; the indoors are kept a few degrees (F) warmer than I am used to in Chicago, which has a sim­i­lar (out­doors) climate.

I’d expect that if I stayed here I’d sweat off about 10 lbs just doing stan­dard office work, which could explain how the aver­age frailty here is notice­ably higher.

A Can of Coke

SI mea­sure­ments mean a can of pop is 330ml, which is just shy of 11.2 oz. In the US, it’s a 12oz can. That’s about 12 calo­ries less sugar per-can, which would be another rea­son why peo­ple here are thinner.

Metropolitan

Holy Christ as a cracker.

So here’s the thing: U.S. cities are mostly planned and Cartesian; they’re on a grid. It may not be per­fect, but you can expect big long streets that run the length of the city, cross-streets that cut over, and a few excep­tions that cut diag­o­nally to help you get from A — C with­out going north to B, then over to C. Once and a while, a street will dead-end for some rea­son, and you’ll have to go around the block, or up and over a few to find an under­pass beneath the express­way or avoid a one-way sec­tion of a street.

And for you native Bostonians, I rec­om­mend you come visit your cousins in Chicago and you’ll see what I mean… Hell, even Newark has a grid.

You can also expect the num­bers to count up coher­ently: if I say that Madison and State are (0,0), and I live on 1800 N. Wells, you can fig­ure out pretty eas­ily how to get from Madison and State to my house by glanc­ing at a map. The only infor­ma­tion that isn’t encoded in the address is the X axis of Wells, which means that once I know 2D geom­e­try (which every­one is taught the first year of High School), the only addi­tional cog­ni­tive load required to find my way to any given address is the miss­ing coör­di­nate of the street the address is on. I have to learn that Wells = 200 West, that x = –200. And that’s some­thing you can learn once and never for­get. If I do have to detour for some rea­son, I know that I’ve cut over to Clark, which is 100 West, and can get back most any time I want.

Not so in London, at least Tower Hill, which is where my hotel is. Without some kind of map, it isn’t even pos­si­ble to dis­cern that you’re headed the wrong direc­tion — even Sol has deserted you in your quest. The clos­est ana­logue I can imag­ine is that some mad fiend has turned the heart of a major met­ro­pol­i­tan area into the cul-de-sac hell that is restricted to the sub­urbs in the US.

I’m not say­ing that Hell is wrong, but I can turn left twice and still end up trav­el­ling the same direc­tion, because the streets all curve and stop after a block or two. Just sayin’

This also means that cab­bies here have a tremen­dous racket, as they can legit­i­mately mean­der around a neigh­bor­hood try­ing to find a street which only exists for a block or two. It also means that no mat­ter where you are, where you’re going, or how you’re get­ting there, it will take you about an hour.

Transit Costs

The Underground is 2.3x more expen­sive than the CTA. Yes, things are much more posh, and London is more expen­sive in gen­eral, but it costs me 6 USD, rather than 2.5 USD to get anywhere.

Cheers

“Thanks, you’re a dia­mond, babe” is not some­thing you’d ever hear in the U.S. for let­ting some­one bum a smoke. (Well, maybe Boystown.) I tend to worry that I come across as some­thing of an ogre for the busi­nesslike, give-nothing-away, “thanks” I’m used to. We’re not ass­holes, we just play poker.

Update: If you’re tempted to take offense, please recall these are tongue-in-cheek, touristy obser­va­tions of a con­fessed business-traveling Chicagoan who actu­ally did enjoy him­self, par­tic­u­larly on Brick Road the night before he left. ;-)

23 Responses

  1. Simon says:

    The air-conditioning thing is some­thing you’ll find almost any­where out­side of the US. I’ve trav­eled a bit, and when in the US, I usu­ally find places like office build­ings and malls to be unpleas­antly cool. It’s odd to me, that in mid sum­mer, I might be sweat­ing in the sun, then need a jacket if I go inside.

  2. Your Name Here says:

    Google Maps Navigation is a life saver here in Omaha. I can’t imag­ine oper­at­ing with­out it in London..

  3. ttx says:

    I per­son­ally pre­fer unordered streets/them curv­ing etc. Been grow­ing up in Germany, and here it’s pretty much the same. Well, actu­ally, over most of Europe you find those dis­or­derly streets, due to all the his­tory behind the cities and settlements.

    Walking/Driving through all those metic­u­lously ordered streets in the USA just made it seem so… indexed. It’s already bad enough how much is indexed about peo­ple every­where, but to have almost the exact geo­graphic loca­tion just by your street-name? That’s just that extra-bit of creepy to me. Of course, if you have the address, you can find out the exact loca­tion over here, too. But not just by read­ing the street-name unless you live in the neigh­bour­hood. It might be more con­ve­nient the way the US does it, but it’s just one of those things that give me an even worse feel­ing of “being indexed”.

    And yes, Underground is extremely expen­sive in London…

  4. Andrew says:

    Two things I thought I would mention.

    It’s not just Tower Hill! Most Towns and Cities in the UK are laid out in the same way. I imag­ine it’s because they have devel­oped over such a long time. The only place in the UK that I can think of that has been devel­oped accord­ing to a grid is Milton Keynes.

    Are you using an Oyster Card on the Underground? Paper tick­ets are fiendishly expen­sive. Oyster Card tick­ets cost sig­nif­i­cantly less.

  5. Emmanuele says:

    if you’re stay­ing more than two days in London, always get your­self a pays-as-you-go Oyster card. there’s a small deposit fee (£6, last time I checked) and then you’ll pay half the ticket price for tube and buses. and you can return it at the end of the trip and you’ll get the deposit back.

  6. other_Simon says:

    Your blog is invis­i­ble in Google Chrome, just thought I’d let you know.
    It never “fades in”.

  7. James Cape says:

    ttx,

    Actually you know quite a bit less about where some­one lives from their street name in Chicago than you would in London. If I say I live on Myddleton, you know where I live to within a few blocks (and could crack wise about Arsenals fans). Wells is 81 blocks/15km long, but starts at the wealth­i­est neigh­bor­hoods in Chicago: Lincoln Park and the Gold Coast (very Cubs), runs into the down­town, stops for a bit, then gets picked up again on the south side run­ning past US Cellular Field, which us north-siders crack wise about hav­ing to dodge bul­lets after the games.

    Other streets, like Western Ave, are nearly 40km long.

    andrew, emmanuele,

    There’s some­thing sim­i­lar in Chicago, though it requires reg­is­ter­ing and hav­ing a card mailed to you last I checked — I assume your com­ments mean Oyster isn’t quite as dif­fi­cult to get ahold of.

    other_simon,

    Could you elab­o­rate on what ver­sion of Chrome you’re using? I use Chromium (5.0.377 in Ubuntu, try­ing out 6.0.472 PPA now) as my default browser these days and it works fine…

  8. Grant says:

    As has been men­tioned, it’s not just the large cities in Europe — the vast major­ity of the towns and cities are the same. It’s because, for the most part, they haven’t been ‘designed’ or ‘planned’ — they’ve grown organ­i­cally from much smaller begin­nings. I per­son­ally think it’s much nicer this way — espe­cially when think­ing about get­ting from one part of a city to another. You have to think about it and plan your route a bit more… none of this ‘two over and five up’ approach to nav­i­ga­tion non­sense! You actu­ally have to navigate!

  9. Pingback: James Cape: Little Differences: London | Gnu Architecture

  10. Bob bobson says:

    People are more frail on aver­age in London? What? We’re cer­tainly not as obese as you lot are.

  11. Phil says:

    $6 for a tube jour­ney? You’re pay­ing cash rather than using an Oyster card aren’t you?

    Tower Hill is in Zone 1. Oyster PAYG sin­gle price to any­where else in Zone 1 is £1.80, whereas the cash price is £4.

    Oh, and there’s a rea­son every­one in London owns a portable copy of the AtoZ. You can buy them every­where for a few quid. Get one :)

  12. mathw says:

    Oyster cards are easy to get — there are machines which vend them in every Underground sta­tion, and you can top them up at the usual ticket machines. Well worth it if you’re not just pass­ing through.

    The streets are def­i­nitely like that because the city is old. Really, really old. Everywhere else in the UK is the same — Milton Keynes is a notable excep­tion due to being a new town built after the Second World War. Most every­where else has roots in set­tle­ments hun­dreds or thou­sands of years old. We’ve got cities that still par­tially reflect Roman street plans, and streets which still run more or less where they ran in the time of Henry VIII.

    Personally I think that’s pretty awesome.

  13. Your Name Here says:

    That’s because while civil­i­sa­tion thrived in Europe, over­seas you were still hang­ing from trees like igno­rant apes. Which is basi­cally what you remained through­out cen­turies of “evo­lu­tion”. And now you sud­denly feel like you’ve got some­thing to teach us on bark, branches and leaves.

    Not every­where you will find a McDonaldised soci­ety, and this always dis­con­certs you, I know, not to find a mir­ror in which to stare at your own faces for days on end. Luckily, there are still towns and coun­tries you’ve not destroyed to have them rebuilt… yet.

  14. Your Name Here says:

    does the Coke in lon­don have cane sugar, beat sugar, or high fruc­tose corn syrup?

    HFCS has been known to cause spon­ta­neous det­o­na­tion in rats.

  15. Oyster cards never expire, either (or if they do it’s a looooong time­out), so you can just get one and keep it for when­ever you next hap­pen to be in London. I only go to the UK once a year, usu­ally, but I keep an Oyster card in my ‘UK wal­let’. There’s really no excuse for ever using any­thing else to travel in London. You *can* reg­is­ter and have your Oyster card tied to your iden­tity if you really want to — you have to do this if you want to use some of the options like pay­ing a flat monthly rate or a stu­dent rate or some­thing — but if you just buy one from a dis­penser it’s anony­mous. They’ll track the hell out of where you go using that card, of course, but there’s no way to know that it’s you who owns it. The other London travel tip is that using the buses is a lot cheaper than the tube, but the prob­lem with that is it’s much harder to work out, and they don’t have the buses pro­grammed into Google Maps yet so you can’t use that.

    Yes, British cities look the way they do sim­ply because they’re very old and their lay­outs were not planned, as such. There’s the addi­tional com­pli­ca­tion that all the very old stuff is now his­tor­i­cally sig­nif­i­cant and can’t be knocked down. This is why, fr’instance, Cambridge town cen­tre is grid­locked for three hours every morn­ing: the road lay­out was more or less final­ized in the 14th cen­tury and now it’s utterly impos­si­ble to change it because you can’t bull­doze any­thing. So it’s stuck with very nar­row sin­gle lane roads for evermore.

    There’s one advan­tage of the grid sys­tem you didn’t touch on — pub­lic tran­sit. The UK spends quite a lot on tran­sit, but it can still be extremely dif­fi­cult to get around on buses, sim­ply because lay­ing out routes is a gigan­tic night­mare. In a grid sys­tem city you can run a bus on every five streets on each axis, maybe a few express runs on pop­u­lar routes, and you’re pretty much done. (Here in Vancouver, half the bus num­bers are sim­ply the street they run along — the 41 runs all the way along 41st Avenue, all across the city). In a British city where the street lay­out resem­bles a spaghetti bomb, it’s pretty much impos­si­ble to cover the same area with the same level of effi­ciency with the same num­ber of buses.

  16. Dave says:

    Welcome to London, dude! I spent a year in Chicago a while back. Nice town. Don’t know if the cli­mate is all that sim­i­lar though.…

  17. Your Name Here says:

    I vis­ited Chicago many times when I was younger and I really don’t see the sim­i­lar­i­ties in cli­mate. London is MUCH milder. Chicago can expe­ri­ence ungodly extremes. I remem­ber this one win­ter when the temp was down in the –20s F for the week I was there. The still­ness in the air was like noth­ing I’ve ever expe­ri­enced before (even when liv­ing in upstate NY).

  18. other_Simon says:

    Hi James, I’m using Google Chrome (not Chromium) ver­sion 5.0.375.125 from Google’s repos­i­tory and it’s not show­ing up for me. Works fine in FFox.

Leave a Reply

*